Skip to contents

Apply a custom R function to each row/col of a BPCells matrix. This will run slower than the builtin C++-backed functions, but will keep most of the memory benefits from disk-backed operations.

Usage

apply_by_row(mat, fun, ...)

apply_by_col(mat, fun, ...)

Arguments

mat

IterableMatrix object

fun

function(val, row, col) that takes in a row/col of values and returns a summary output. Argument details:

  1. val - Vector length (# non-zero values) with the value for each non-zero matrix entry

  2. row - one-based row index (apply_by_col: vector length (# non-zero values), apply_by_row: single integer)

  3. col - one-based col index (apply_by_col: single integer, apply_by_row: vector length (# non-zero values))

  4. ... - Optional additional arguments (should not be named row, col, or val)

...

Optional additional arguments passed to fun

Value

apply_by_row - A list of length nrow(matrix) with the results returned by fun() on each row

apply_by_col - A list of length ncol(matrix) with the results returned by fun() on each row

Details

These functions require row-major matrix storage for apply_by_row and col-major storage for apply_by_col, so matrices stored in the wrong order may neeed a re-ordered copy created using transpose_storage_order() first. This is required to be able to keep memory-usage low and allow calculating the result with a single streaming pass of the input matrix.

If vector/matrix outputs are desired instead of lists, calling unlist(x) or do.call(cbind, x) or do.call(rbind, x) can convert the list output.

See also

For an interface more similar to base::apply, see the BPCellsArray project. For calculating colMeans on a sparse single cell RNA matrix it is about 8x slower than apply_by_col, due to the base::apply interface not being sparsity-aware. (See pull request #104 for benchmarking.)